The witnesses presented by the General Elections Commission (KPU) Cilacap (respondent) be heard in the Constitutional Court (MK), Monday (10/08/2012) afternoon. The trial for the third time the case 65/PHPU.DX/2012 happenings dispute election results of regional head and deputy regional head of Cilacap in 2012.

Chairman of the Election Committee (PPK) of Central Cilacap, Djoko Wahono explain about the alleged voter data double, double both the name and number (NIK). Djoko said, the Commission has conducted joint scrutiny PPS on September 1, 2012 using Microsof Excel program and database tools (DB Tools).

"Then updated when" asked the Constitutional Judge Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi. "It was immediately held where the double execution," said Djoko.

Relation to the manufacture of billboards for such activities, Constitutional Justice Ahmad Sumadi Fadlil asked who paid for the manufacture of billboards. "Each of the components involved, sir, and it was their initiative," said Anton. "It's not funded by the government? asked Fadlil further. "No, sir," said Anton.

To note, dispute of Cilacap District was filed by Novita Wijayanti-Mochammad Muslich. Cilacap Election followed by two candidates, namely Novita Wijayanti-Mochammad Muslich with number 1 and Tatto Suwarto Pamuji-Akhmad Edi Susanto with number 2. According to Novita-Muslich, Tatto-Edi was a winner set by the Commission, does not reflect the genuine aspirations of the people's sovereignty but because of political pressure and the rule of money. In addition, Cilacap Election which was held September 9, 2012 in breach and fraud marred the massive, systematic and structured. Novita-Muslich postulated Tatto Suwarto Pamuji has made abuse of authority. For example was the deployment of civil servants and administrators of Cilacap to support the victory. (Nur Rosihin Ana / mh/Yazid.tr)